info@biomedres.us   +1 (502) 904-2126   One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300, Westchester, IL 60154, USA   Site Map
ISSN: 2574 -1241

Impact Factor : 0.548

  Submit Manuscript

Short CommunicationOpen Access

Valorization of the Hydroalcoholic Extract of the Raw Wax of Cuban Sugar Cane Volume 52- Issue 2

Rilton Gonçalo Bonfim Primo1*, Eva Sánchez-Hernández2, Jesus Martín-Gil2, Pablo Martín-Ramos2, Manuel Díaz de los Ríos3 and Ricardo de Araújo Kalid4

  • 1Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Doctoral Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), Brazil
  • 2University of Valladolid (UVa), Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering, Spain
  • 3Instituto Cubano de Investigaciones de los Derivados de la Caña de Azúcar (ICIDCA), Cuba
  • 4Federal University of Southern Bahia (UFSB) and Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Doctoral Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), Brazil

Received: August 01, 2023;   Published: August 18, 2023

*Corresponding author: Rilton Gonçalo Bonfim Primo, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Doctoral Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), Salvador, Brazil

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2023.52.008229

Abstract PDF

ABSTRACT

In the present work, the phytochemical composition of a stable lyophilized extract of raw sugar cane wax is described, in which the presence of palmitic and linoleic acids, among other components, stands out. The raw wax was treated in a hydromethanolic medium and sonicated between 15 and 30 kHz, for 5 periods of 1 min, to favor its dissolution. The composition of the phases was analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results obtained show that 70% of the phytocomponents of the hydromethanolic extract of the wax were palmitic or hexadecanoic acid (24.3%); linoleic or 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (18.8%); and others.

Keywords: Pharmacological Items; Phytocomponents of the Hydromethanolic Extract; Ultrasonic Biorefining; Raw Sugar Cane Wax

Abbreviations: GC-MS: Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; FAMEs: Fatty Acids and their Esters; PEI: Post-Graduation Program in Industrial Engineering; DAFE: Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering; UVA: University of Valladolid; TECLIM: Clean Technologies Network; UFSB: Federal University of Southern Bahia

Introduction

Sugarcane wax, also called raw wax, has a complex composition, where both saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, high-molecular- weight fatty alcohols, aldehydes, sterols, and esters predominate as main components, so the refining process is directly associated with the use to which the extracted fraction will be directed. Several methods have been tested and used in industry for sugarcane wax extraction and fractionation. Solvent extraction methods are de most extended, although different alternatives of this method are usually used, as accelerated solvent extraction and supercritical extraction with CO2 [1]. Sonic extraction method is recently extended in many process for natural products obtaining (Table 1). The objective of this work is characterize the hydralcoholic sugarcane extract with the aid of Sonic method in order to recommend possible uses for this fraction [2].

Table 1: Composition of main products obtained.

biomedres-openaccess-journal-bjstr

Materials and Methods

Materials

Raw Cuban sugarcane wax was used for the research.

Characteristics

There is presence of palmitic and linoleic acids between other components.

Methods

The raw wax was treated in a hydromethanolic medium and sonicated between 15 and 30 kHz, for 5 periods of 1 min, to favor its dissolution. The resulting dispersion was greenish to brown in color and the precipitate, after settling, abundant (Figure 1a). The solution was separated by decantation, and the upper phase was subjected to freezing and lyophilization. The composition of the phase was analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [3].

Figure 1: Samples obtained in the different steps.

biomedres-openaccess-journal-bjstr

Discussion

The results obtained show that 70% of the phytocomponents of the hydromethanolic extract of the wax were palmitic or hexadecanoic acid (24.3%); linoleic or 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (18.8%); oleic acid (6.6%); glycerin (6.0%); 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl (4.0%); glycerol 1-palmitate (3.2%); dodecanoic acid (2.7%); octadecanoic acid (2.4%); tetradecanoic acid (1.2%) and pentadecanoic acid (1.0%) (Figure 1b). The high percentage of fatty acids and their esters (FAMEs) in the lyophilized hydromethanolic extract of Cuban wax allows us to consider this product as a bio-fuel, although in the particular case of linoleic acid, its applications extend to the creation of products cleaning, chemical and pharmacological items (Figure 1c). Regarding the two main components, palmitic and linoleic acid, today their mixtures are being marketed as an adjuvant for herbicides, fungicides, acaricides and insecticides for foliar application of fruit trees and hydroponic crops [4] (Figure 2).

Figure 2: ATR-FTIR spectrum of the hydro methanolic extract of Cuban wax showing the characteristic absorption bands of their composition (palmitic and linoleic acids).

biomedres-openaccess-journal-bjstr

Acknowledgement

To Post-Graduation Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI) of Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), the Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering (DAFE) of University of Valladolid (UVA), and Clean Technologies Network (TECLIM) of Federal University of Southern Bahia (UFSB) for receiving us, support, and training.

References

  1. Díaz M, Hernández E (2020) Composición de la cera de caña de azúcar y el empleo de solventes para su extracción y fraccionamiento. Enfoque orientado a su aplicació ICIDCA sobre los derivados de la caña de azúcar 54: 13-22.
  2. Attard TM, McElroy CR, Rezende CA, Polikarpov I, Clark JH, et al. (2015) Sugarcane waste as a valuable source of lipophilic molecules. Ind Crops Prod 76: 95-103.
  3. Inarkar MB, Lele SS (2012) Extraction and Characterization of Sugarcane Peel Wax. ISRN Agron 2012: 340158.
  4. Martinez R, Castro I, Oliveros M (2002) Characterization of Products from Sugar Cane Mud. Rev Soc Quiḿ Mex́ 46(1): 64-66.