Evaluation of Multimodality Imaging Based Vaginal Cuff Boost with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Endometrial Cancer: An Original Article Volume 56- Issue 2
Selcuk Demiral, Omer Sager*, Ferrat Dincoglan and Murat Beyzadeoglu
Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Medical Faculty, Turkey
Received: March 12, 2024; Published: April 18, 2024
*Corresponding author: Omer Sager, Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Medical Faculty, Ankara,
Turkey
Objective: Endometrial cancer is a significant public health concern for women with its critical incidence
around the globe. The utilization of a vaginal cuff boost may be considered for patients deemed to be at a
higher risk of vaginal recurrence. With improved stereotactic localization of well-defined targets under image
guidance, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) offers a highly precise radiotherapeutic modality. More
recently, SBRT has been used for vaginal cuff boost as an alternative to brachytherapy. Herein, we assess
target definition for vaginal cuff SBRT with comparative analysis of Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic
Resonance Imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: In the context of this study, the endpoint has been targeting definition for vaginal
cuff SBRT with comparative analysis of CT and MRI. All included patients were referred to the Department
of Radiation Oncology at Gulhane Medical Faculty, University of Health Sciences for vaginal cuff SBRT. We
undertook a comparative analysis of target definition by CT simulation images for SBRT planning and with MRI.
CT simulations of the patients were carried out at CT-simulator (GE Lightspeed RT, GE Healthcare, Chalfont
St. Giles, UK) available at our department. Also, MRI of patients were acquired and used for comparative
evaluation. Results: We found that CT and MRI defined target definition resulted in differences. Thus, we utilized fused
CT and MRI for ground truth target volume definition for vaginal cuff SBRT. Conclusion: From a radiation oncology perspective, our results may have implications for increased adoption
of multimodality imaging-based target definition for vaginal cuff SBRT, nevertheless, the need for future
studies to shed light on this critical issue may not be neglected.
Endometrial cancer is a significant public health concern for
women with its critical incidence around the globe [1]. Surgery, radiation
therapy (RT), and systemic treatments may be used alone or
in combination for management of endometrial cancer with respect
to patient, disease, and treatment characteristics [2-7]. Recently, Stereotactic
Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a viable irradiation
technique for management of a variety of cancers throughout
the human body. The utilization of a vaginal cuff boost may be
considered for patients deemed to be at a higher risk of vaginal recurrence.
Cervical stromal invasion along with other factors including
age, margin status, grade, extent of invasion, histology, and lower
external beam RT doses may be regarded as critical issues to consider
for optimal patient selection. Admittedly, recent years have witnessed
critical advances in technology. Automatic segmentation techniques,
molecular imaging methods, Image Guided RT (IGRT), Intensity Modulated
RT (IMRT), stereotactic RT, and adaptive RT (ART) techniques
have been introduced for improved radiotherapeutic management of
patients [8-49]. With improved stereotactic localization of well-defined
targets under image guidance, SBRT offers a highly precise radiotherapeutic
modality. High doses of radiation may be delivered
in a single fraction or with a limited number of fractions, and highly
conformal treatment with steep dose gradients around the target may
allow for optimal irradiation with an acceptable toxicity profile. More
recently, SBRT has been used for vaginal cuff boost as an alternative to
brachytherapy [7]. Herein, we assess target definition for vaginal cuff
SBRT with comparative analysis of Computed Tomography (CT) and
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
Department of Radiation Oncology at University of Health Sciences
serves a tertiary cancer center for patients from Turkey and
abroad. By using state of the art irradiation techniques, a plethora
of benign and malignant tumors are irradiated here. In the context
of this study, the endpoint has been target definition for vaginal cuff
SBRT with comparative analysis of CT and MRI. All included patients
were referred to the Department of Radiation Oncology at Gulhane
Medical Faculty, University of Health Sciences for vaginal cuff SBRT.
We undertook a comparative analysis of target definition by CT simulation
images for SBRT planning and with MRI. CT simulations of
the patients were carried out at CT-simulator (GE Lightspeed RT, GE
Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, UK) available at our department. Also,
MRI of patients were acquired and used for comparative evaluation.
The Linear Accelerator (LINAC) with the capability of sophisticated
IGRT techniques has been utilized for stereotactic irradiation. After
rigid patient immobilization, planning CT images were acquired at
CT-simulator for vaginal cuff SBRT planning. Thereafter, acquired
SBRT planning images have been transferred to the delineation workstation
via the network. Target volumes and normal tissues were
contoured on these images and structure sets were generated. Also,
target definition has also been performed on MRI for comparison
purposes. All patients underwent vaginal cuff SBRT at Department of
Radiation Oncology at Gulhane Medical Faculty, University of Health
Sciences.
The current study has assessed target definition for vaginal cuff
SBRT with comparative analysis of CT and MRI. Stereotactic irradiation
procedures have been performed at our Radiation Oncology Department
of Gulhane Medical Faculty at University of Health Sciences.
Prior to vaginal cuff SBRT, all included patients have been individually
evaluated by a multidisciplinary team of experts from surgical oncology,
radiation oncology, and medical oncology. Critical goal of vaginal
cuff SBRT planning has been to achieve optimal target coverage
without violation of critical organ dose constraints. IGRT techniques
such as kilovoltage cone beam CT was used, and vaginal cuff SBRT
has been delivered by Synergy (Elekta, UK) LINAC. We found that CT
and MRI defined target definition resulted in differences. Thus, we
utilized fused CT and MRI for ground truth target volume definition
for vaginal cuff SBRT.
Endometrial cancer is a significant public health concern for
women with its critical incidence around the globe [1]. Surgery, radiation
therapy (RT), and systemic treatments may be used alone or in
combination for management of endometrial cancer with respect to
patient, disease, and treatment characteristics [2-7]. Recently, SBRT
has emerged as a viable irradiation technique for management of a
variety of cancers throughout the human body. Admittedly, recent
years have witnessed critical advances in technology. Automatic segmentation
techniques, molecular imaging methods, IGRT, IMRT, stereotactic
RT, and ART techniques have been introduced for improved
radiotherapeutic management of patients [8-49]. With improved stereotactic
localization of well-defined targets under image guidance,
SBRT offers a highly precise radiotherapeutic modality. High doses
of radiation may be delivered in a single fraction or with a limited
number of fractions, and highly conformal treatment with steep dose
gradients around the target may allow for optimal irradiation with an
acceptable toxicity profile. More recently, SBRT has been used for vaginal
cuff boost as an alternative to brachytherapy [7]. The utilization
of a vaginal cuff boost may be considered for patients deemed to be
at a higher risk of vaginal recurrence. Cervical stromal invasion along
with other factors including age, margin status, grade, extent of invasion,
histology, and lower external beam RT doses may be regarded as
critical issue to consider for optimal patient selection.
In the context of radiation oncology, improved target definition
and critical organ sparing should be considered among the pertinent
aspects of optimal stereotactic irradiation. Determination of larger
target volumes may lead to radiation induced toxicity, and definition
of smaller than actual target volumes may result in decreased local
control of the disease. It should be mentioned that adaptive irradiation
approaches and multimodality imaging-based target definition
may be suggested to improve radiotherapeutic results [50-106]. The
current study has assessed target definition for vaginal cuff SBRT
with comparative analysis of CT and MRI. Stereotactic irradiation procedures
have been performed at our Radiation Oncology Department
of Gulhane Medical Faculty at the University of Health Sciences. Prior
to vaginal cuff SBRT, all included patients have been individually evaluated
by a multidisciplinary team of experts from surgical oncology,
radiation oncology, and medical oncology. The critical goal of vaginal
cuff SBRT planning has been to achieve optimal target coverage without
violation of critical organ dose constraints. IGRT techniques such
as kilovoltage cone beam CT were used, and vaginal cuff SBRT has
been delivered by Synergy (Elekta, UK) LINAC. We found that CT and
MRI defined target definition resulted in differences. Thus, we utilized
fused CT and MRI for ground truth target volume definition for
vaginal cuff SBRT. From a radiation oncology perspective, our results
may have implications for increased adoption of multimodality imaging-
based target definition for vaginal cuff SBRT, nevertheless, the
need for future studies to shed light on this critical issue may not be
neglected.
Kim JH, Kim DY, Kim J, Noh JJ, Hwang WY, et al. (2024) Practice guidelines for management of uterine corpus cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement. J Gynecol Oncol 35(2): e45.
Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Gamsiz H, et al. (2020) Multimodality management of cavernous sinus meningiomas with less extensive surgery followed by subsequent irradiation: Implications for an improved toxicity profile. J Surg Surgical Res 6: 056-061.
Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Uysal B, et al. (2020) Single Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) versus Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (FSRT) for Vestibular Schwannoma (VS). J Surg Surgical Res 6: 062-066.
Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Gamsiz H, et al. (2014) Evaluation of Linear Accelerator (Linac)-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery (Srs) for the Treatment of Craniopharyngiomas. UHOD-Uluslararasi Hematoloji Onkoloji Dergisi 24(2): 123-129.
Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Sager O (2023) An Original Article Revisiting the Utility of Multimodality Imagıng For Refıned Target Volume Determinatıon Of Recurrent Kidney Carcinoma. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 23(5): 556122.