info@biomedres.us   +1 (720) 414-3554
  One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300, Westchester, IL 60154, USA

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research

September, 2019, Volume 22, 3, pp 16715-16717

Mini Review

Mini Review

Demographics of OCD and Effective Treatment: Brief Report

Rufino KA1-3, Werner C5* and Mc Ingvale E4,5

Author Affiliations

1Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

2University of Houston- Downtown, USA

3The Menninger Clinic, Houston, TX, USA

4McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA

5Houston OCD Program, Houston, TX, USA

Received: October 25, 2019 | Published: November 05, 2019

Corresponding author: Werner C, Houston OCD Program, Houston, TX, USA

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.22.003761

Introduction

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a common and debilitating disorder that worsens without appropriate treatment. Due to stigma, lack of resources, demographics, and cultural bias many individuals are not receiving appropriate care. The aim of this study was to examine treatment disparities based on geographic locations. Results from this study found that Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) was more likely to be used with individuals living in the United States and Australia than those living in Asia and India. Additionally, individuals living in the United States, South and Central America were more likely to take medication for OCD. Results also revealed that individuals living in the United Kingdom were less likely to try medication. These results highlight the need for education at a global level around effective treatment for OCD.

Keywords: OCD; ERP; Medication; Demographic Locations

Introduction

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a severe and disabling mental illness that worsens over time without effective treatment. Evidence based Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) in combination with medication management of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) is the preferred treatment for OCD [1]. The lifetime prevalence of OCD is approximately 2-3% of the general population [1] which translates to roughly 200 million people globally. It takes an average of 17 years for an individual to receive appropriate treatment (i.e. ERP and medication management) from the onset of symptoms (Jenike, 2004). The prevalence rates of OCD among ethnic minorities are similar across the board, however there is a clear underrepresentation of mental health services among ethnic minorities [2]. Ethnic minorities are less likely to receive adequate treatment for OCD due to a wide range of factors including low income, racism, stigma surrounding mental health, family factors, and cultural differences [3,4]. Acknowledging the specific barriers in treatment amongst ethnicities will provide a focus for what disparities need to be addressed [5]. Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders use mental health services less frequently than any other minority [6].

Additionally, African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Native Americans are more likely to drop out of treatment prematurely; additionally, African Americans and Latin Americans are less likely to be prescribed medications [5]. When accounting for consistent OCD prevalence rates globally and across all minority groups [7] understanding what factors (i.e. cost, stigma, religious beliefs, racism, demographic locations) are creating treatment resistance may assist in addressing these barriers by providing more knowledge to the public about these treatment inefficiencies. One study evaluating 166 college students found that Caucasians attended a much greater degree of therapy sessions than those of African American, Asian American, and Latino descents. Obsessive- Compulsive Disorder is a common and disabling disorder that is undertreated among all ethnicities [8] and many countries do not have adequate treatment readily available for those suffering with OCD or related disorders [9].

When considering ethnic minorities, having a diagnosis of OCD is in proportion to the general population [2] however access to and utilization of treatment varies greatly. Understanding the specific treatment disparities related to OCD globally will allow for enhancements to education and awareness in order to lessen this gap. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate users of a self-help OCD website to better understand minority’s access to and utilization of psychological and pharmacological treatment for OCD.

Method

The present study included 2094 participants ranging from 7 to 77 years of age (M = 30.98, SD = 12.06). Participant data used for this study was de-identified data from the OCD Challenge website (a free self-help website for OCD) with institutional review board (IRB) approval. Participants voluntarily signed up for this program and consented to data use prior to completing questionnaires used in this study. Demographic questions around medication use, ERP and country of residence were used. The sample was slightly skewed toward female (62.0%), and a majority (74.4%) was Caucasian followed by Asian/Pacific Islander (6.9%) and individuals who preferred not to disclose (5.9%). Most participants report their residence as the United States (US) (75.3%) followed by the United Kingdom (UK) (6.7%) and other European countries (4.3%).

Results

Results revealed a significant association between country of residence and whether the individual has reported taking medication [χ2(9) = 27.79; p = .001]. Follow up analyses, utilizing a Bonferroni correction, revealed significant individual chi square tests for the participants living the US [χ2 (1) = 7.13; p = .008], the UK [χ2 (1) = 7.18; p = .007], and South and Central America [χ2 (1) = 7.73; p = .005]. Participants living in the US and South or Central America were more likely to report having taken medication, while participants living in the UK were more likely to report they had not. Results also revealed there was a significant association between country of residence and whether the participant reported experience with ERP [χ2 (9) = 29.61; p = .001]. Follow up analyses, utilizing a Bonferroni correction, revealed significant individual chi square tests for the participants living in India [χ2 (1) = 12.82; p < .001], Australia [χ2 (1) = 5.11; p = .024], and Asia [χ2 (1) = 7.40; p = .007]. More specifically, participants living in Australia were more likely to report participating in ERP, while participants living in India and Asia were more likely to report they had not.

Discussion

Findings from this study further confirm treatment disparities for OCD that exist based on geographic location. Results indicate that individuals who in the United States, Central and South America were more likely to report past medication use for OCD while individuals in the UK were more likely to report they had not taken medication in the past. Despite this finding, results revealed no association among geographic location and current medication use. Results identified that individuals in Australia were more likely to have engaged in ERP and individuals in Asia and India were more likely to report they had not engaged in ERP treatment, revealing a treatment disparity among country of residence. These findings are limited due to both our sample size and nature of our sample. Individuals from this sample voluntarily accessed a selfhelp website for OCD without a screening metric. Further research should appropriately screen/diagnose OCD and replicate these demographics to confirm study findings.

We know that a treatment gap of 58.2% exists for OCD in the Americas [10], further indicating that other countries with less treatment engagement may have even higher treatment gaps. This study confirms disparities relating to medication management and ERP for OCD. Medication is utilized to a lessened degree outside of the Americas while ERP is underutilized in Asia and India. Although our findings suggest that Australians may be most likely to have received ERP previously, further research should confirm this finding. We know that OCD prevalence rates remain the same across the globe yet both access to treatment and treatment utilization varies significantly. These findings further corroborate the need for global access to evidence based treatment for OCD, which is recognized as the combination of medication and ERP, in order to lessen the gap across the globe between those diagnosed with OCD and those receiving evidence-based care.

References

Mini Review

Demographics of OCD and Effective Treatment: Brief Report

Rufino KA1-3, Werner C5* and Mc Ingvale E4,5

Author Affiliations

1Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

2University of Houston- Downtown, USA

3The Menninger Clinic, Houston, TX, USA

4McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA

5Houston OCD Program, Houston, TX, USA

Received: October 25, 2019 | Published: November 05, 2019

Corresponding author: Werner C, Houston OCD Program, Houston, TX, USA

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.22.003761

Abstract

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a common and debilitating disorder that worsens without appropriate treatment. Due to stigma, lack of resources, demographics, and cultural bias many individuals are not receiving appropriate care. The aim of this study was to examine treatment disparities based on geographic locations. Results from this study found that Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) was more likely to be used with individuals living in the United States and Australia than those living in Asia and India. Additionally, individuals living in the United States, South and Central America were more likely to take medication for OCD. Results also revealed that individuals living in the United Kingdom were less likely to try medication. These results highlight the need for education at a global level around effective treatment for OCD.

Keywords: OCD; ERP; Medication; Demographic Locations