info@biomedres.us   +1 (720) 414-3554
  One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300, Westchester, IL 60154, USA

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research

September, 2020, Volume 30, 4, pp 23589-23593

Research Article

Research Article

Allergic Rhinitis and Rhinopharyngitis - How Often We Meet them in the Occupational Pathology?

Dermendzhiev S1,2 and Ilkova P2

Author Affiliations

1Division of Occupational Diseases and Toxicology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria

2Department of Occupational Diseases and Clinical Allergy Activity, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, “St. Georgi”, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Received: September 10, 2020 | Published: September 23, 2020

Corresponding author: Ilkova P, Department of Occupational Diseases and Clinical Allergy Activity, University Multiportfolio Hospital for Active Treatment, “St. Georgi”, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2020.30.004986

Abstract

The World Allergy Organization suggests that 400 million people suffer from allergic rhinitis, which is the most common of all, and 300 million-number asthma is estimated to reach 400 million by 2025 and rapidly increasing in children.Work-related rhinitis may be distinguished into:

(1) Occupational rhinitis that is due to causes and conditions attributable to a particular work environment.

(2) Work-exacerbated rhinitis that is pre-existing or concurrent rhinitis exacerbated by workplace exposures.

Since it causes little disability, it is often neglected by affected individuals. However, it is often the preliminary manifestation of a respiratory disorder that could lead to physical complications and socio-economic disability.

Nevertheless, raising public awareness to work-related pathology during last years, the level of detection of occupational diseases in Bulgaria is significantly lower in comparison to EU member countries. Here we present a summarized report on results ofactivities, according to the contract with “Labor conditions” Fund of Ministry of Labor and Social Policy,conductedintheDepartment of Occupational Diseases and Clinical Allergy Activity, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, “St Georgi” Plovdiv,Bulgaria.

Summary

Report on results of diagnostic and treatment activities, according to the contract with “Labor conditions” Fund of Ministry of Labor and Social Policy,conductedintheDepartment of Occupational Diseases and Clinical Allergy Activity, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, “St Georgi” Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Keywords: Allergic Rhinitis; Occupational Etiology; Detection of Occupational Diseases

Introduction

The World Allergy Organization suggests that 400 million people suffer from allergic rhinitis, which is the most common of all, and 300 million-number asthma is estimated to reach 400 million by 2025 and rapidly increasing in children[1]. The professional rhinitis is an episodic demonstration with symptoms likesneezes, rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction correlated in the activity of the work.Work-related rhinitis may be distinguished into:

(1) Occupational rhinitis that is due to causes and conditions attributable to a particular work environment.

(2) Work-exacerbated rhinitis that is pre-existing or concurrent rhinitis exacerbated by workplace exposures[2].

Since it causes little disability, it is often neglected by affected individuals. However, it is often the preliminary manifestation of a respiratory disorder that could lead to physical complications and socio-economic disability[3]. Nevertheless, raising public awareness to work-related pathology during last years, the level of detection of occupational diseases in Bulgaria is significantly lower in comparison to EU member countries[4].Allergic rhinitis is not only considered as a disease entity but also in the context of medical certification as the allergic disease associated with occupational exposure. The interval enters the first exposure to the aggressive agent and the development of the symptoms can vary of a few weeks in more than twenty years, with a variable period of latency between one and three years. The diagnosis of professional rhinitis depends on medical anamneses and on a survey on the employment [3].

According to a research OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration): 22% of the European workers are in touch with dangerous substances during at least a quarter of their working time[5]. The newest studies show that there isenough convincing evidence that tight relationships between the upper and lower airways also apply to the workplace context. Most patients with occupational asthma (OA) also suffer from occupational rhinitis (OR), although OR is 2 to 3 times more common than OA[6]. According to the statement of EAACI, the group of Occupational rhinitis includes Allergic OR and Non-allergic OR.Allergic OR encompasses both IgE-mediated OR and non-IgE-mediated OR depending on the molecular weight of the agent and also the role ofIgE-mediated mechanism, respectively. Non-allergic OR - This category encompasses different types of rhinitis caused by the work environment through irritant, non-immunological mechanisms.

Material and Methods

Detailed overview and analysis on all the Reports about results of the diagnostic and health care activities for the period 2017- 2019, based on the of contractbetween“Labor Conditions” Fund and University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, “St Georgi” Plovdiv have been conducted. The expert assessment regarding the occupational etiology of patients diagnosed with allergic rhinitis was performed onthe basis of the current regulations on the administration of occupational pathology in Bulgaria[7]. In all patients with allergic rhinitis and suspected work related origin were conducted skin-allergy Prick tests with standard indoor and outdoor allergens panel as well as Epicutaneous test with European standard series for epicutaneous testing (European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group).The full list of allergens are presented in Table 1.The following diagnostic procedures were performed in all patients - detailed inquiry of inhaled agents in the work environment, general and occupational anamnesis, full ORL status, skull x ray in in semi-axial projection, consultation with other specialist - pulmonologist, allergy, blood testing anddiscussion in front of the specialized commission including specialist in occupational pathology (Table 1).

Table 1: List of Allergens.

Results

Department of Occupational Diseases and Clinical Allergy Activity, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, “St Georgi” Plovdiv, performs annual diagnostic and treatment activities under a contractbetween the hospital and the “Labor Conditions” Fund at the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy, Bulgaria. The Department is certified for diagnosis, treatment and expert assessment of patients with occupational diseases and clinical allergy by the Ministry of Health. For the period 2017 -2019, under the inpatient programs, 487 patients have been observed and in almost half of them, the professional origin of the diagnosed diseases was suspected or confirmed [8] (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Total number of patients treated in Department of Occupational diseases and Clinical allergy activity, Multiprofile Hospital “St. Georgi”, Plovdiv for 2017-2019.

Occupational respiratory diseases were diagnosed in almost half of all patients have been observed. As can be seen from the attached chart, occupational rhinitis is more common than occupational asthma (Figure 2). A total of 80 patients with allergic rhinitis were diagnosed over a three-year period. According to the etiological reasons, the following results were reported(Figure 3).

Figure 2: Number of patients with occupational diseases of respiratory system split by diagnosis 2017-2019.

Figure 3: Patients with confirmed allergic rhinitis and rhinopharyngitis split by etiology.

a) In 38% of the patients hypersensitization to micro-ticks, wood and grass pollen were defined as a reason for allergic rhinitis

b) 28 patientswere diagnosed with vasomotor and druginduced allergic rhinitis

c) Occupational etiology were confirmed in 28% of patient.

Conclusion

(1) As the results of the deep analysis of all reports, we concluded that the share of allergic rhinitis is increasing in the respiratory pathology among occupational exposure patients.

(2) Number of patients with occupational origin of the rhinitis also growing.

(3) During the prosses of expert assessment of the patients with occupational rhinitis a lot of factors should be considered factors outside the work environment related to other common illnesses andmedications prescribed for them, the individual reactivity and characteristics of each patient shouldbealso taken into consideration.

Method Validation

Carry-Over and LLOQ: Carry-over was a problem for the measurement of PBG with an autosampler wash solvent containing high organic solvent. Therefore, the autosampler needle was rinsed from a wash vial containing distilled water. The Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) for ALA (defined as the concentration where the imprecision was < 20%) was 1.4 μmol/l. The LLOQ for PBG was 1.0 μmol/l.

Linearity: The r2 for the ALA calibration curve was 0.998 and the r2 for the PBG calibration curve was 0.999. Results from spiked urine showed that the assay was linear up to at least 360 μmol/l ALA, and 200 μmol/l PBG.

Precision and Accuracy: The between batch Coefficient of Variation (CV) for ALA ranged from 2.5% to 6.2%, the within batch CVs for ALA ranged from 2.5 to 8.4%, and the recoveries ranged from 110 to 112%. The between batch CVs for PBG ranged from 1.5% to 20% (near the LLOQ), the within batch CV for PBG ranged from 2.3% to 4.1%, and the recoveries ranged from 107 to 110% (see Table 2). CVs below 15%, and recoveries of 100% (±15%) were considered acceptable. The Recipe QCs were all within the acceptable ranges provided by the manufacturer. Over 5 separate runs, the ALA low QC mean was 30.4 μmol/L (ref value 32.3 (acceptable range 24.2 – 40.4) μmol/L), the high ALA QC was 131.5 μmol/L (ref value 142 (113 – 170) μmol/L), the low PBG QC was 6.5 μmol/L (ref value 7.9 (5.5 – 10.3) μmol/L), and the high PBG QC was 74.8 μmol/L (ref value 69.7 (52.3 - 87.1) μmol/L). The between batch CVs for the Recipe controls were < 3.2% for ALA and < 5.2% for PBG.

References

Research Article

Allergic Rhinitis and Rhinopharyngitis - How Often We Meet them in the Occupational Pathology?

Dermendzhiev S1,2 and Ilkova P2

Author Affiliations

1Division of Occupational Diseases and Toxicology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria

2Department of Occupational Diseases and Clinical Allergy Activity, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, “St. Georgi”, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Received: September 10, 2020 | Published: September 23, 2020

Corresponding author: Ilkova P, Department of Occupational Diseases and Clinical Allergy Activity, University Multiportfolio Hospital for Active Treatment, “St. Georgi”, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2020.30.004986

Abstract

The World Allergy Organization suggests that 400 million people suffer from allergic rhinitis, which is the most common of all, and 300 million-number asthma is estimated to reach 400 million by 2025 and rapidly increasing in children.Work-related rhinitis may be distinguished into:

(1) Occupational rhinitis that is due to causes and conditions attributable to a particular work environment.

(2) Work-exacerbated rhinitis that is pre-existing or concurrent rhinitis exacerbated by workplace exposures.

Since it causes little disability, it is often neglected by affected individuals. However, it is often the preliminary manifestation of a respiratory disorder that could lead to physical complications and socio-economic disability.

Nevertheless, raising public awareness to work-related pathology during last years, the level of detection of occupational diseases in Bulgaria is significantly lower in comparison to EU member countries. Here we present a summarized report on results ofactivities, according to the contract with “Labor conditions” Fund of Ministry of Labor and Social Policy,conductedintheDepartment of Occupational Diseases and Clinical Allergy Activity, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, “St Georgi” Plovdiv,Bulgaria.

Summary

Report on results of diagnostic and treatment activities, according to the contract with “Labor conditions” Fund of Ministry of Labor and Social Policy,conductedintheDepartment of Occupational Diseases and Clinical Allergy Activity, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, “St Georgi” Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Keywords: Allergic Rhinitis; Occupational Etiology; Detection of Occupational Diseases